Anyone who visits the wikipedia page of freelancer.com will find it funny to see that the page is completely vandalized by the company recruited employee who is responsible for ensuring their version of wikipedia page to stay. It seems that the page is the "about us" page of the company in wikipedia's domain. But they faced resistance there.
This is the book of misdeeds committed by freelancer.com. As the company is huge it is reluctant to care about the interests of its users, both freelancers and employers. To answer whether it is a full scam or not it can be said, "No, it is not selling resorts on the moon". Does this suffice? People consider the unethical practices and ripping off policies as the signs of scam.
Showing posts with label Freelancer.com wikipeadia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freelancer.com wikipeadia. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)